Welcome to Sprocket School! This project is maintained by volunteer editors. Learn more about how this works.

Masking: Difference between revisions

Jump to navigation Jump to search
→‎Modern Scenarios: Changed heading to "Current Practice." Made some minor changes to wording.
(→‎Modern Scenarios: Changed heading to "Current Practice." Made some minor changes to wording.)
Line 19: Line 19:
Although it is more rare some theaters have fixed-width screens in which case the visible screen size with the masking all the way open would be 1.85:1 and the top and bottom masking would close down for wider aspect ratios like 2.39:1 or 2.2:1. This is common in theaters built before the widescreen era that retained their original screen footprint (rather than installing a wider screener in front of the original front of house).
Although it is more rare some theaters have fixed-width screens in which case the visible screen size with the masking all the way open would be 1.85:1 and the top and bottom masking would close down for wider aspect ratios like 2.39:1 or 2.2:1. This is common in theaters built before the widescreen era that retained their original screen footprint (rather than installing a wider screener in front of the original front of house).


===Modern Scenarios===
===Current Practice===
Although being able to only accommodate 1.85:1 "flat" and 2.39:1 "scope" works well for venues screening mostly new releases and older titles produced after the "widescreen chaos" era (so after the 1950s) American films, those committed to the proper presentation of films from any era, and any country, need more flexibility. They require masking systems that enable them to properly mask films of a wider variety of aspect ratios that span the entire history of cinema. While it's rare to encounter a venue operating today that has the masking, lenses, and aperture plates needed to accommodate every single aspect ratio, including those for both 35mm and [[70mm]], venues who routinely screen a wide variety of repertory titles will usually be able to accommodate 1.33:1 (for silent films), 1.37:1, and widescreen aspect ratios 1.85:1,1.66:1, and 2.39:1.  
Although being able to only accommodate 1.85:1 "Flat" and 2.39:1 "Scope" works well for venues screening mostly new releases and older American titles produced after the "widescreen chaos" era of the 1950s, those committed to the proper presentation of films from any era, and any country, need more flexibility. They require masking systems that enable them to properly mask films of a wider variety of aspect ratios that span the entire history of cinema. While it's rare to encounter a venue operating today that has the masking, lenses, and aperture plates needed to accommodate every single aspect ratio, including those for both 35mm and [[70mm]], venues that routinely screen a wide variety of repertory titles will usually be able to accommodate full-frame 1.33:1 for silent films, 1.37:1, the widescreen aspect ratios 1.85:1 and 1.66:1, and 2.39:1.


In the digital era, some first-run theaters (or theaters built in the digital era) started to move away from the use of adjustable masking, relying instead on the projected image to provide a sharp edge to the picture. However, improperly masked digital images will have grey letterboxing or pillarboxing around the image instead of a black border.
In the digital era, some first-run theaters (or theaters built in the digital era) started to move away from the use of adjustable masking, relying instead on the projected image to provide a sharp edge to the picture. However, improperly masked digital images will have grey letterboxing or pillarboxing around the image instead of a black border.
470

edits

Navigation menu